I was reading through the documentation for mod_rewrite, and I noticed that "G," the gone directive sends a status code of "410," which means "gone," and not "404," which means not found. Strictly speaking there's a slight difference in meaning.  I suppose "not found" implies it was never there, and "gone" implies it was deleted; but does anyone actually use it?  I don't think so.

From mod_rewrite documentation (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/mod_rewrite.html):[G] (force URL to be Gone)
Forces the current URL to be gone. Send the HTTP response, 410 (GONE).

Anyone care to comment? I know on my sites, I just send 404s when I delete pages or items.  Theoretically, since many people who delete records actually just flag the records deleted, not physically delete them, a distinction could be made in that case — but I know I don't bother.

Update: I found the answer here on Matt Cutts' blog by accident.  It says "Google treats a 404 HTTP status code (page not found, but it may reappear) and a 410 HTTP status code (page not found, and it’s gone forever) in the same way. I believe that we treat 404s as if they were 410s; once Googlebot has seen a 404 at that location, I think we assume that the document is gone forever. Given how many people use 404 instead of 410, that’s probably a good call for the time being."

Tell an amigo:
  • Sphinn
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook



Related posts:
Using 500 Error Status Codes to Avert Indexing Erroneous Pages Once upon a time, in a place far away, your...
Does URL Parameter Order Matter? This is a question I'm currently researching. I have never...
Real-Time Stock Quotes Gone from Google? Oh no!  Real-time (ECN) stock quotes appear to be gone...
Does a Link to an Excluded Page on a Site Have any Link Value? Suppose a webmaster excludes a duplicated page on his site...
Google does Evil? The following is a quote straight from Google's Investor Relations...