Sep 27

NY Bar Takes Aim at Cheeseball Lawyer Spam Sites

Posted by Jaimie Sirovich on Sep. 27th, 2006. 1 comments — voice your opinion.

NEED A GREAT WEB SITE? NEED IT TO BE SEARCH-ENGINE-FRIENDLY?

SEO Egghead is a web development firm dedicated to creating custom, search engine optimized web site applications. We specialize in eCommerce and content management web sites that not only render information beautifully to the human, but also satisfy the "third browser" — the search engine. To us, search engines are people too. Click here to talk to us. We'd love to help!
X

The NY Bar has a new set of rules for lawyers floating around.  Apparently, they got wind of the blatant cheeseball spamming lawyers are employing to solicit clients on the internet.  I'd cite examples, but they'd probably get me sued :(  They responded in spades, though:

1. "… content …shall be predominantly informational, and shall be designed to increase public awareness of situations in which the need for legal services may arise … "  In other words, keyword stuffing and landing pages are out.  It always amazed me that law firms posted this crap to begin with.  A "Juris Doctor" should not be spamming — this is clear.

2. "An advertisement or solicitation shall not depict the use of a courtroom or courthouse."  Can we say cheeseball?

3. "An advertisement or solicitation shall not utilize a nickname, moniker, motto, or trade name that implies an ability to obtain results in a matter."  Ok, so www.super-duper-lawyers-for-you-in-kansas-city-missouri-free-sucky-sucky-with-retainer.com is out.  

4. It also says legal web sites cannot employ irrelevant keyword stuffing in the meta tags, pop-ups.  I've never seen this either …

So, basically, the NY Bar is trying to accomplish a lot of what Google is doing for them anyway.  But man, I'm glad someone finally said something about it.  What really puzzles me is why anyone would commission a lawyer who does this stuff to get cases.  If he's doing anything shady to get rankings, what does that say about his values as a whole?

Unfortunately, the same document includes several stipulations that seem reactionary.  Among other things, it may require lawyers to print and submit every revision of a blog post to the NY bar.  This is ridiculous — I agree.

But is it any more ridiculous than lawyers soliciting clients using obviously black hat techniques?

Tell an amigo:
  • Sphinn
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook



Related posts:
Obvious Spam Signatures; Digital Point Co-op, Free Counters, etc. Today, Barry Schwartz of Search Engine Roundtable blogged about the...
Corporate Comment Spam? It's now pretty clear that companies must monitor their online...
The Woes of Legal SEO If you actually read my little bio over on the...
Free SEO Site Clinic Sites Selected The sites for the Free SEO Site Clinic are selected! ...
Microsoft's Anti-Spam Project I said awhile back in my post, Google Violates Computer...




"Only One Wise Comment Banged Out Somewhere On The Internet ..."


Mosquito

To me there is nothing more NATURAL than lawyers using obviously blackhat techniques. Lawyers are the orginal scum.



Care To Bang On The Keys ... ?

BECOME AN EGGHEAD. SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEED!

Learn to be as nerdy as we are by never missing our latest blog entries. Receive great tips, tricks, and ideas on improving your web site every day! Subscribe via our RSS Feed or use the chicklets in the sidebar.