|
Jul
14
0
|
PageRank for Trust Building; is PageRank Really "Dead?" |
|||||
So there was just a PageRank update, and everyone is excited as usual; but perhaps a bit less this time. I know PageRank is "dead" as a metric of site importance and ranking. I don't deny this at all. I'm glad most people shook the PageRank obsession. Barry agrees with me in this post. I remember when PageRank was hyped to the point that people were spoofing PageRank using redirects to artificially inflate the value of domains. SEO Black Hat documented this here. He says: "This further illustrates how useless Page Rank has become in measuring a site's importance." Ok, so PageRank is dead as a metric for "site importance;" but what about trust? It's useful for that (as long as it's not spoofed!). I see PageRank as similar to HackerSafe and TRUSTe logos. Like PageRank, most of these services are absolutely meaningless beyond the trust building effect they have. So give PageRank some credit; it's also a lot cheaper than paying for the above. It also tends to come naturally as you build links in any case. Oh, and HackerSafe only has a PR of 4, by the way Related posts: 6 Questions To Weed Out Charlatan SEOs. Make Suggestions … There are a lot of idiots charlatans still out there... Checking for Dead Links Automatically This neat little class can return the HTTP status code... Is EliteRetreat Dead? A little more than a month ago, Aaron Wall, Lee... Mattcuttsarama: 21 Great SEO Tips From Google's Matt Cutts This is a compilation of stuff Matt Cutts has said...
| ||||||
|


















